Report: Counties that spray the most glyphosate have higher non-Hodgkin lymphoma rates 

by Cami Koons, Iowa Capital Dispatch
March 16, 2026

A report from the environmental group Food & Water Watch found that the majority of counties that are in the top 20% for glyphosate application have non-Hodgkin lymphoma rates above the national average. 

In Iowa, the report concludes that 82% of high-spray counties have elevated rates of lymphatic cancer. The report, Food & Water Watch argues, “underscores the need to fight back” on proposed pesticide labeling policies and on the overall use of chemical pesticides. Glyphosate is a commonly used herbicide.

The study comes just days after the latest Cancer in Iowa Report from the Iowa Cancer Registry found that cancer rates among agricultural communities in Iowa were lower, for most cancers, than statewide averages. 

Researchers with the Cancer in Iowa Report said additional research into pesticide application in the state could help to assess risks for those in agricultural communities. 

The Food & Water Watch report is correlative. It overlaid county-level data of glyphosate application rates with non-Hodgkin lymphoma incidence rates per county.

It found that 60% of counties with the highest rates of glyphosate application in the country, have above-average rates of non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This percentage is even higher, at 71%, when considering late-stage diagnoses of the cancer. 

Non-Hodgkin lymphoma has been central to lawsuits against Monsanto, now owned by Bayer, in which plaintiffs alleged the product Roundup, which contains glyphosate, caused them to develop the specific type of cancer. 

While some studies indicate there is an associated risk between glyphosate-based herbicides and non-Hodgkin lymphoma, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and Bayer hold that the product is not a human carcinogen and is safe when used according to the label. 

Monsanto has paid more than $11 billion in settlements and recently announced an up to $7.25 billion, long-term class settlement agreement to help resolve current and future claims. 

The company has also lobbied in state and national governments for laws that would say pesticide labels issued by the EPA are sufficient in satisfying any requirement to warn users of the product’s health and safety. This language would prevent “failure to warn” claims against pesticide products. 

A bill with this language passed the Iowa Senate in 2025, but was not taken up by the House before the end of session last spring and has not been revived by House leadership so far into the 2026 session. 

Bills with similar language have advanced at the federal level, including in the recently drafted Farm Bill from the House agriculture committee. The U.S. Supreme Court is also set to hear a case from the company and decide if an existing federal law preempts failure-to-warn claims against pesticide labels. 

Food & Water Watch has opposed these bills and noted in its recent report the language would “strip cancer patients of their rights to seek compensation for the harms they’ve suffered, all while protecting pesticide industry profit.” 

President Donald Trump recently issued an executive order calling for the preservation of elemental phosphorus and glyphosate-based herbicides. 

Food & Water Watch Research Director Amanda Starbuck said in a statement the president’s “embrace” of glyphosate will “make America very, very sick.” 

“It’s time to follow the science and end our reliance on dangerous pesticides once and for all,” Starbuck said. 

Iowa Capital Dispatch is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Iowa Capital Dispatch maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Kathie Obradovich for questions: info@iowacapitaldispatch.com.